🔗 Share this article

The nation's controversial action to ban social networking access for individuals under sixteen is sending ripples internationally. Officials, child protection groups, and families are watching intently to see if this tactic will become a template for countries abroad.

European Trend

Throughout Europe, a rising chorus of nations are moving toward parallel measures.

• Denmark plans a ban on social media for children under fifteen, with the leader arguing that smartphones and networks are "taking away our youngsters' youth". Legislation is expected to be formalized next year.
• Norway is set to enforce a age restriction of 15, pointing to the need to protect children from the "influence of the algorithms".
• Ireland is developing a digital ID system to verify the age and identity of social media account holders. Officials have suggested that an Australian-model ban could be "an options on the table".
• In The Spanish government, the leader has urged parliament to enact a law increasing the legal age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the president has threatened a ban for children below 15, and a parliamentary commission has recommended a comparable action, including an overnight "digital curfew" for older teenagers.
• The authorities in The Dutch government has urged guardians to restrict their kids from social media before 15.

Across the European Union, the bloc's legislature has adopted a symbolic statement supporting a ban for minors unless a parent decides otherwise is given. Even though it highlights of the "habit-forming" nature of these apps, the step does not establish enforceable legislation.

"A clear age limit is a good first step," stated a leading European lawmaker supporting the resolution.

The United Kingdom: A Cautious Approach

In the UK, the government has kept open a possible ban, emphasizing that "no option is discarded" but stressing any action must be "based on conclusive evidence".

Earlier, support built behind a bill to impose restrictions on social media use by teenagers, but it was eventually weakened. Instead, the government vowed to conduct more studies the issue.

Campaign organizations have voiced warnings. A prominent charity established by the loved ones of a young person who was lost after encountering dangerous online content contends that a blanket age ban could fail to improve online safety and could create a "cliff edge" of risk when users become eligible.

"Australia's ban is a response to the inability of the tech sector to build platforms and apps that are safe and fit for children," stated a leading child protection advocate.

The United States: A Fragmented Approach

Stateside, action is primarily unfolding at the regional government level against a backdrop of country-wide gridlock.

• Utah mandates guardian permission for minors to use social media and restricts late-night use.
• Florida has passed a law prohibiting under-14s from accessing social media, though it is subject to court battles.
• Virginia has enacted a rule restricting minors to one hour of social media use per day, with extra time requiring adult consent.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly enacted laws demanding adult authorization for teenagers to set up social media profiles.

Even with widespread concern and suggestions from certain individuals to mimic this path, a federal ban is presently seen as improbable.

International Views

Outside of Europe and the US, further countries are similarly considering moves.

• Malaysia plans to ban social media for teenagers beginning next year.
• Brazil has raised the access age for Instagram to 16.

Yet, global agencies adopt a more nuanced position. The UN children's agency has cautioned that age-based restrictions carry risks and "could have unintended consequences". The organization notes that the internet can be a "critical link" for marginalized youth and that regulation should not be a "substitute" for social media firms to improve user protection.

As this global discussion continues, the policies of the Australian government and others show that states around the world are increasingly prepared to stand by for tech companies to make changes on their own.